SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 684

ANJANI KUMAR
SUBHAS CHAND BHARATI – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.N.Pandey

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against the order dated 25th January, 2001 passed by the trial court decreeing the suit of landlord against the petitioner for ejectment due to arrears of rent. Against the order, petitioner preferred a revision before the revisional court under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts, Act, 1887, which resulted into rejection of the revision. These are the two orders which the petitioner has challenged by means of this petition.

( 2 ) THE trial court after considering the evidence on record came to the conclusion and recorded its findings that the provisions of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 are not applicable to the tenancy in question. The trial court recorded the findings that tenancy has been determined under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It has also recorded that petitioner-tenant has arrears of rent and has not deposited the rent. The revisional court repelled the arguments of the petitioner and affirmed the order of the trial court. In view of the concurrent findings recorded by the trial court and affirmed by the revisional court, this Court will not interfere with the orders impugned in the presen







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top