SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 764

VINEET SARAN, G.P.MATHUR
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
GAYATRI SRIVASTAVA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
LALJI SINHA, V.K.Goel

G. P. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal act, 1987, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 17. 1. 2002 of the claims Tribunal by which the claim petition filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 6 was allowed and respondent No. 1 was awarded rs. 1,50,000 and respondent Nos. 2 to 6 were awarded Rs. 50,000 each as compensation on account of death of Ramesh chandra Srivastava in a train accident.

( 2 ) THE claimant-respondent No. 1 is the widow and respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are the minor children of Ramesh Chandra Srivastava who was working as fitter grade I in North-Eastern Railway and was posted at Ballia Railway Station. On 7. 2. 1994 he was going from Gorakhpur to Ballia and at 21. 10 hours while alighting from 511-Up train at Indara Railway Station, he slipped and fell down from the train. His leg was amputated as the train ran over him. The station staff rescued him and sent him to Mau Railway Station for treatment but when he reached the hospital he was declared dead. The claimants-respondents preferred a claim petition which has been allowed by the impugned order.


( 3 ) MR. Lalji Sinha, the learned counsel for the appellants, has su












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top