SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 918

M.KATJU, K.N.SINGH
VIJAI KUMAR VERMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Madhur Prakash, S.P.SINGH

( 1 ) LEARNED Government Counsel may file counter affidavit within a month.

( 2 ) ISSUE notice to respondent No. 4 returnable at an early date.

( 3 ) UNTIL further order of this Court we stay the arrest of the petitioner in Case Crime No. 214 of 2001, under Sections 409, 420, 468, 467 and 471, I. P. C. Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Mathura but the investigation may go on.

( 4 ) WE have heard Sri S. P. Singh, General Secretary of the High Court Bar Association as Amicus Curiae, in this case.

( 5 ) THE petitioner Vijai Kumar Verma is a Government Servant posted in the U. P. Police Department as Sub Inspector (Ministerial)/head Clerk in the office of the Superintendent of Police, Hathras. By means of this writ petition the petitioner is challenging the impugned F. I. R. filed against him. This F. I. R. states that certain appointment under Dying in Harness Rules was obtained by playing some fraud in which the petitioner was also involved. The petitioner claims that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated. The only allegation against him in the impugned F. I. R. is that he did not make proper verification of the documents relating to the appointment made under the Dying i


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top