SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 898

M.P.SINGH, B.K.ROY
MONIKA OHRI – Appellant
Versus
AMIT MISRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MURLIDHAR, RAM PRASAD SINGH

( 1 ) THE three petitioners, who are related as daughter, mother and father and stand impleaded as Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 respectively in the Matrimonial Petition No. 172 of 1997 filed before the Court of Judge, Family Court, Allahabad (Respondent No. 2) by Respondent No. 1 under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking grant of a decree for divorce of petitioner No. 1 dissolving their marriage and for a declaration that it is null and void as contained in Annexure 1, have knocked the doors of this constitutional Court taking aid of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for (i) quashing by grant of writ of Certiorari the proceedings of Matrimonial Petition No. 172 of 1997 aforesaid (ii) and restraining respondent No. 2 by grant of a writ of Prohibition from proceeding with the aforementioned petition.

( 2 ) PARAGRAPH Nos. 1 to 13 of the Matrimonial Petition aforementioned reads as follows -"1. That the petitioner is resident of village Chandauki, Pergana Sikandra, Tehsil Phulpur district Allahabad and the petitioner is about 30 years of age. 2. That the respondent No. 1 had been living with opposite parties 2 and 3 in IFFCO Unit Phulpur, Allahabad in the year 1989.



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top