K.N.SINGH, M.KATJU
VIRENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Counsel.
( 2 ) THIS petition has been held against the First Information Report dated 12-7-2002 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) under Section 506, I. P. C. In this F. I. R. the allegation is that the petitioners are threatening to kill the first informant.
( 3 ) IT is not necessary for us to quash the F. I. R. in view of the observations and directions made below.
( 4 ) SECTION 506, I. P. C. as mentioned in the first schedule to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is declared to be a non cognizable and bailable offence. However, it appears that by U. P. Govt. notification No. 777/viii 9-4 (2)-87 dated 31/07/1989, published in the U. P. Gazette, Extra, Part-4, Section (kha) dated 2/08/1989 it was declared to be a cognizable and non bailable offence. This notification states as follows. "in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 (Act No. XXIII of 1932) read with Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (Act No. 10 of 1897) and in suppression of the notifications issued in this behalf, the Governor is pleased to declare that any offence punishable
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.