SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 1044

U.S.TRIPATHI
ABDUL SALAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MOHD.ASIF

U. S. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Section 482, Cr. P. C. has been filed for setting aside the order dated 5-6-2002 passed in Sessions Trial No. 535 of 2000 State of U. P. v. Bhoora and others summoning the applicant for trial along with other accused.

( 2 ) AN F. I. R. was lodged by opposite party No. 2 against four unknown persons with the allegations that on 28-9-1999 at about 8 a. m. four unknown persons abducted his brother Pramod. On the basis of above F. I. R. a case at crime No. 557 of 1999 under Section 364, I. P. C. was registered at P. S. Deoband, district Saharanpur. After investigation police submitted charge-sheet against three persons namely Bhoora @ Meharban, Munshi @ Mursalin and Usman under Sections 364/120-B, I. P. C. The cognizance was taken against above persons by the Magistrate and the case was committed to the Court of Sessions.

( 3 ) BEFORE Sessions Judge, an application was moved by the prosecution for summoning applicant Abdul Salam in the case for trial along with other co-accused mainly on the ground that he was also involved in the offence.

( 4 ) THE learned Sessions Judge on considering the evidence of victim Pramod held that the applicant wa











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top