SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 1349

U.S.TRIPATHI
MAHENDRA PAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SUNIL A.KULKARNI

U. S. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Section 482, Cr. P. C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1255 of 2002, Yogendra v. Mahendra and others under Ss. 323, 307, 452 and 504, I. P. C. , P. S. Pahasu, district Bulandshahar pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Khurja (Buland-shahar) and for setting aside the order dated 2-2-2002 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Bulandshahar in Criminal Revision No. 77 of 2001.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this application, briefly narrated, are that on 2-4-1998 Rakesh Kumar Sharma applicant No. 2 lodged a report against Yogendra opposite party No. 2 and three other persons under Sections 323, 504 and 427, I. P. C. with the allegations that on 1-4-1998 at about 6 p. m. while he was returning to his house from his duties and reached in front of house of Suresh Chandra, the accused of the said case namely Suresh Chandra, Pintoo and Yograj caused injuries on him with lathi Danda and also extended threats. During Marpit a sum of Rs. 6,000. 00 which he was keeping in his pocket had fallen down and could not be traced. On the basis of above report a non-cognizable
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top