SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 1440

ANJANI KUMAR
NAGAR PALIKA – Appellant
Versus
NAGAR PALIKA MALI, SAFAI KAMGAR UNION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Mandhyan, PREM CHANDRA, Y.K.Sinha

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this writ petition. Nagar Palika, Ghaziabad through its Executive Officer has challenged the award of the Labour Court-II, Ghaziabad in Adjudication Case No. 292 of 1989 wherein the following dispute was referred to the labour court :. . (VERNACULAR MATTER OMMITED ). .

( 2 ) THE aforesaid reference was answered by the labour court in favour of the workmen by holding that the workmen are entitled for regularisation. It is stated at the bar that during the pendency of the writ petition, all the workmen who are respondents in this writ petition, have been regularised as the posts have been sanctioned. It is made clear that the labour court awarded regularisatlon to the workmen from the date of their respective appointment, The case set-up by nagar Palika before the labour court was that there is no sanctioned post against which they can be regularised.

( 3 ) IN this view of the matter, the award is modified to the extent that the workman will be entitled for regularisation from the date of award and not earlier to that. The recovery certificate, if it has not already been complied with, it is also modified accordingly. Needless to say that the recove



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top