IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Anjani Kumar, J.
NAGAR PALIKA - Appellant
Versus
NAGAR PALIKA MALI, SAFAI KAMGAR UNION - Respondents
C. M. W. P. 85 Of 1994
Decided On : 10/08/2002
Labour Court - Regularisation of Workmen - The court modified the award to entitle the workmen for regularisation from the date of the award and not earlier, and quashed the recovery certificate.
Fact of the Case:
The Labour Court awarded regularisation to the workmen from the date of their respective appointment, but the petitioner argued that there were no sanctioned posts for regularisation.
Finding of the Court:
The court modified the award to entitle the workmen for regularisation from the date of the award and not earlier, and quashed the recovery certificate.
Issues: Dispute over regularisation of workmen and the availability of sanctioned posts for regularisation.
Ratio Decidendi: The workmen were entitled to regularisation from the date of the award, and the recovery certificate was quashed.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of finally with the modification of the award and quashing of the recovery certificate.
( 1 ) BY means of this writ petition. Nagar Palika, Ghaziabad through its Executive Officer has challenged the award of the Labour Court-II, Ghaziabad in Adjudication Case No. 292 of 1989 wherein the following dispute was referred to the labour court :. . (VERNACULAR MATTER OMMITED ). .
( 2 ) THE aforesaid reference was answered by the labour court in favour of the workmen by holding that the workmen are entitled for regularisation. It is stated at the bar that during the pendency of the writ petition, all the workmen who are respondents in this writ petition, have been regularised as the posts have been sanctioned. It is made clear that the labour court awarded regularisatlon to the workmen from the date of their respective appointment, The case set-up by nagar Palika before the labour court was that there is no sanctioned post against which they can be regularised.
( 3 ) IN this view of the matter, the award is modified to the extent that the workman will be entitled for regularisation from the date of award and not earlier to that. The recovery certificate, if it has not already been complied with, it is also modified accordingly. Needless to say that the recovery certificate also deserves to be quashed and is hereby quashed. It will be open to the workman to file such application for the execution of the award as modified and as are available to them under law, before the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Ghaziabad. With the aforesaid observation the writ petition is disposed of finally.
.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.