IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
G. P. Mathur and N. K. Mehrotra, JJ.
DR. PRAKASH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA - Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION - Respondents
C. M. W. P. 15449 Of 2001
Decided On : 10/25/2002
Mandamus - Appointment of Principal - U. P. Higher Education Services Commission Act, 1980, Section 12(2), 12(3), 13(3), 14(1)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to appoint him as Principal of a degree college. He had been selected for the position, but the Director of Higher Education, U. P. refused to issue a placement order in his favor, citing another candidate's higher position in the roster.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had given the institution as his first preference, while the other candidate had listed it as his fourth preference. The court noted the lack of willing candidates for the rural institution and the petitioner's long-standing service and contributions to the college, ultimately allowing the writ petition and directing the appointment of the petitioner as Principal.
Issues: Dispute over the issuance of a placement order for the appointment of the petitioner as Principal, based on the order of preference and roster position of the candidates.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the requirement for the Director of Higher Education to consider the order of preference indicated by candidates and the obligation of the management to issue an appointment letter to the candidate whose name has been intimated.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the Director of Higher Education, U. P. was directed to pass a placement order for the appointment of the petitioner as Principal of the college.
( 1 ) THIS writ petition under Article. 226 of the Constitution has been filed praying that a writ of mandamus be issued commanding the Director of Higher Education, U. P. to pass a placement order for appointing the petitioner as Principal of Lala Laxmi Narain Degree College, Sirsa, allahabad.
( 2 ) THERE is a degree college known as Lala Laxmi Narain Degree College at Sirsa in the district of Allahabad. The regular Principal of the college retired from service in February, 1994, after attaining the age of superannuation and the petitioner was appointed as officiating Principal on 8. 3. 1994. The management of the college intimated the vacancy to the Director of Higher education, U. P. , in accordance with Section 12 (2) of the U. P. Higher Education Services commission Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The Director then notified the vacancy to U. P. Higher Education Services Commission (hereinafter referred to as the commission) in accordance with Section 12 (3) of the Act. The Higher Education Services commission issued Advertisement No. 25 for making selection on the post of Principals of several degree colleges and postgraduate colleges in the whole of the State. The petitioner applied for the post of Principal of a degree college and indicated his first preference for the institution in question, namely, Lala Laxmi Narain Degree College, Sirsa, Allahabad. The commission declared the result of the selection on 18. 4. 2001 for various degree colleges and postgraduate colleges. Amongst the persons selected for the post of Principal of a degree college, the petitioners name appeared at SI. No. 28, and, thus, he became entitled to be appointed as principal of a degree college.
( 3 ) IT is averred in the writ petition that the petitioner had joined the Lala Laxmi Narain Degree college, Sirsa, Allahabad, as lecturer when the institution was established on 4. 10. 1971. He was promoted as reader in August, 1988, and since March, 1994, he started functioning as officiating principal of the college with the approval of the Vice-Chancellor of Kanpur University. The college made commendable progress and B. Sc. (Biology and Mathematics groups) and B. Ed, classes were started after the petitioner took over as officiating Principal of the College. In the academic session 2000-2001, 2,300 students (both boys and girls) were studying in the college. After the result had been declared by the Commission and it was known that the petitioner had been selected for the post of Principal of a degree college, Sri Omkar Nath Agarwal, the manager of the college, sent a letter to the Director of Higher Education, U. P. on 20. 4. 2001 requesting him that a placement order be issued in favour of the petitioner for his appointment as principal of the college.
( 4 ) IN the counter-affidavit filed by Dr. R. K. Baslas, Director of Higher Education, U. P. , it is stated that appointment on the post of Lecturer and Principal in an affiliated college (other than a government college) is made in accordance with Higher Education Services Commission Act and the procedure for making appointment is given in Section 12 of the said Act. It is averred that the Director of Higher Education, U. P. , is not bound to make a placement order according to the choice of the candidate and the same has to be done in a prescribed manner by taking into consideration the roster made in accordance with U. P. Public Services (Reservation for scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Act, 1994. It is admitted that the petitioner has been selected for the post of Principal and his name finds place at SI. No. 28 in the merit list of the selected candidates of general category. It is also admitted that the petitioner had given his first preference for placement in the institution In question, namely, Lala Laxmi Narain degree College, Sirsa, Allahabad. However, the stand taken is that another candidate, namely, dr. Sadhu Singh Chauhan, who
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.