( 1 ) AVE heard learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 30-10-2002 Annexure 1 to the writ petition cancelling her licence to run a canteen in S. S. P. G. Hospital, varanasi and a public call office (P. C. O.)within the premises of Rajkiya Manila chikitsalaya, Varanasi.

( 3 ) IT is alleged in paragraph 4 of the writ petition that the petitioner was granted a licence to run a P. C. O. within the premises of Rajkiya Manila Chikitsalaya, Varanasi by the order of Chief Medical Superintendent of the said hospital dated 21-10-2000 vide annexure-3 to the writ petition. It is alleged that there is no complaint against her regarding running of the P. C. O. and she has invested a lot of money. In paragraph 7 of the writ petition it is alleged that the petitioner was granted a licence for running a canteen within the premises of S. S. P. G. hospital vide order dated 24-9-2002, annexure- 4 to the writ petition. It is alleged that the petitioner has raised temporary construction and has invested one lac rupees in this business.

( 4 ) IT is alleged in paragraph 14 of the writ petition that the local M. L. A. wanted to get allotted the said pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document