YATINDRA SINGH, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER filed a case, namely, O. A. No. 2229 of 1998 before Central Administrative Tribunal (Principal Bench) New Delhi (the CAT) for the relief that he may be granted salary from 2. 1. 1998 to 20. 10. 1998 and for grant of temporary status under the DOPT scheme dated 10. 9. 1993. It was alleged in that application that the petitioner was forced to work as casual labour in the name of some body else. The CAT decided this OA on 9. 12. 1999. The Tribunal held that the petitioner was involved in doubtful activities. However, a direction was issued to investigate the matter at higher level and it was further directed that in case the report was in favour of applicant, then he would be reengaged. The inquiry of higher level was conducted and a report was made on 12. 5. 2000 and in view of the report, the petitioner was not reengaged. The petitioner filed a contempt application with the CAT alleging that its direction dated 9. 12. 1999 had not been obeyed. This contempt application after hearing the parties was dismissed on 20. 7. 2000. Thereafter the petitioner filed a fresh case, namely, O. A. No. 1903 of 2000 challenging the report dated 12. 5. 2000 in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document