SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 92

M.KATJU, B.S.CHAUHAN
P. P. RASTOGI – Appellant
Versus
MEERUT UNIVERSITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, Ravi Kant, W.H.Khan

M. KATJU AND B. S. CHAUHAN, JJ.

( 1 ) THIS is an application to review the jugment dated 27-11-1995 passed by the Bench of Honble paritosh K. Mukherji J. and Honble Jagdish Bhalla, JJ. Since Honble Paritosh K. Mukherji, J. has retired and Honble Jagdish Bhalla, JJ. is sitting in Lucknow Bench of this Court, Honble the chief Justice by order dated 2-12-1996 has nominated this review application before us.

( 2 ) HEARD Shri Ravi Kant, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri W. H. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners.

( 3 ) IN our opinion this application is liable to be rejected on the short ground that the applicants have no locus standi in the matter. Admittedly, this application for review has not been filed by the Committee of Management, but by certain members of the Committee of Management.

( 4 ) IN our opinion, an individual member of the Committee of Management has no locus standi in such cases and it is only the Committee of Management alone which can appear as a party in the case. To permit individual members of the Committee of Management to appear before us would create a lot of problems because any individual member or several members may file applications at any




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top