SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 354

R.K.MAHAJAN
VIDYA DHAR DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANS. CORPN. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.L.Jaiswal

R. K. MAHAJAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of the above two appeals arising out of order dated 18. 2. 1983 passed by Mr. Sangam Lal Tripathi, District Judge, Jaunpur acting as Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in Claim Petition Nos. 32 and 39 of 1979. The learned Tribunal rejected the claim petitions. In m. A. C. T. Case No. 32 of 1979, the deceased was Gayatri Devi. She was widow and issueless. She was the aunt of the claimants. In M. A. C. T. Case No. 39 of 1979, the deceased was Sankatha prasad, and Amardevi claimant-appellant is sister of deceaseds maternal uncle. As mentioned in the grounds of appeal, they have alleged that they are themselves to be the dependants of the deceased. Under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Tribunal invoked the provisions of Fatal Accidents Act (13 of 1855) under which only the legal heirs of the deceased- parents, wife and son, can claim the compensation.

( 2 ) THE unfortunate accident took place on 8. 2. 1978 in which so many persons had died and 30 were injured.

( 3 ) I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have perused the entire record. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and perusing the impug









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top