SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 481

S.K.PHAUJDAR
SRI SATNARAYAN JI MAHARAJ VIRAJMAN MANDIR SAT NARAYAN DHARAMSHALA – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA PRASAD AGGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.Garg, S.N.SRIVASTAVA

S. K. PHAUJDAR, J.


( 1 ) THIS first appeal from order is directed against an order dated 27-31996, followed by a formal order dated 17-41996 recorded by the IInd Addl. Distt. Judge. Bijnaur, in Misc. Cafe No. 113 of 1990 under Section 92, CPC rejecting the prayer of the appellants for leave to institute a suit of the nature spoken of under Section 92, CPC. The application in question was filed by the present appellants under Section 92, CPC read with Order 1, Rule 8 and Section 151 CPC. It was stated that the property indicated in the plaint stood vested in the Almighty and the temple and other properties of the deity formed a public trust and a suit for relief covered by Section 92. CPC could be filed only after obtaining leave of the court.

( 2 ) IN the application before the court below it was stated that Sahu Chhajmal Das was a renowned Zamindar of religious bend of mind and for the religious Hindus in general he had set up a temple of Satayanarayan Ji Maharaj more than 100 years ago. A deity was installed in the temple. The people used to assemble there for worship. The Zamindar also sank a well and also set up a dharamshalla for the benefit of the followers of Hindu religion.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top