S.K.PHAUJDAR
SRI SATNARAYAN JI MAHARAJ VIRAJMAN MANDIR SAT NARAYAN DHARAMSHALA – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA PRASAD AGGARWAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS first appeal from order is directed against an order dated 27-31996, followed by a formal order dated 17-41996 recorded by the IInd Addl. Distt. Judge. Bijnaur, in Misc. Cafe No. 113 of 1990 under Section 92, CPC rejecting the prayer of the appellants for leave to institute a suit of the nature spoken of under Section 92, CPC. The application in question was filed by the present appellants under Section 92, CPC read with Order 1, Rule 8 and Section 151 CPC. It was stated that the property indicated in the plaint stood vested in the Almighty and the temple and other properties of the deity formed a public trust and a suit for relief covered by Section 92. CPC could be filed only after obtaining leave of the court.
( 2 ) IN the application before the court below it was stated that Sahu Chhajmal Das was a renowned Zamindar of religious bend of mind and for the religious Hindus in general he had set up a temple of Satayanarayan Ji Maharaj more than 100 years ago. A deity was installed in the temple. The people used to assemble there for worship. The Zamindar also sank a well and also set up a dharamshalla for the benefit of the followers of Hindu religion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.