SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 579

A.N.GUPTA
MUNNA BABU – Appellant
Versus
. SHANNO BEGUM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.A.KHAN, M.Naseer Ullah

A. N. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner and opposite party are husband and wife respectively. Admittedly, they were married sometimes in the year 1985 under the Muslim Act. On 7-2-86, Opposite Party moved an application u/s. 3 (2) of Muslim Women Protection of Rights On Divorce, Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), for maintenance allowance, for Rs. 11,000. 00 as MEHAR and recovery of ornaments and properties and other ornaments given to her before, at the time and after marriage. The list of such items was given alongwith the application which includes ornaments, utensils, cycle, tape-recorder, sewing machine and clothes etc. It was alleged by her in her application that after the marriage she resided with the petitioner but the petitioner used to beat her on one pretext or the other and his family members used to say that very little dowry was given. The petitioner used to threaten opposite party that either she should bring a Scooter from her father or else he would turn her out of the house and would divorce her. It was further alleged in the application that the petitioner was not a man fit for marriage and therefore, used to harass the opposite party. It resulted into







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top