SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 494

M.KATJU, B.S.CHAUHAN
UPADHYA AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


M. KATJU AND B. S. CHAUHAN, JJ.

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition No. 32974 of 1991 and Writ Petition No. 22439 of 1992 are being disposed of by a common judgment. Writ Petition No. 32974 of 1991 has prayed for writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 4-11 -1991 Annexure-3 to the petition and for a mandamus restraining the respondents from interfering with the right of the petitioner of collecting the fee over the Shastri bridge and for a mandamus directing the respondents to accept the contract in favour of the petitioner of realising the fee over Shastri Bridge in respect of auction dated 29-10-1991 for the period 1991-94.

( 2 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel We have also perused the two orders of the Honble Supreme Court communicated through a letter of the assistant Registrar, Supreme Court of India to the Registrar of this Court vide letter dated 22-4-1996. These orders have been passed in S. L. P. No. 9835 of 1994 State of U. P. and Ors. v. Upadhyaya and Company, on 14-7-1994 and on 22-4-1996. The Supreme Court has expressed its shock over certain interim orders passed by this Court in these writ petitions.

( 3 ) THE facts of the case








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top