SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 743

B.K.SINGH, J.BHALLA, K.C.BHARGAVA
MANDI SAMITI – Appellant
Versus
MANDI SAMITI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.Mennen, N.C.Mehrotra, P.C.VERMA, Sharad Kumar Srivastava

B. K. SINGH, J.


( 1 ) THIS review petition has been preferred by the petitioner Mandi Samiti, Sultanpur against the judgment dated 18 January 1989, Reported in (1988) 1 UPLBEC 371 (LB) (FB ). passed by a lamer Bench consisting of three Honble Judges. By the judgment impugned in the review petition three writ petitions were finally decided One of the writ petitions was writ petition No. 2692 of 1979. Ramchandra Nath v. Mandi Samiti, Sultanpur and Anr. The other two writ petitions were writ petition No. 3565 of 1979 and writ petition No. 745 of 1980 The Larger bench by its judgment dated 18 January, 1989 [ (Reported in (1989) 1 UPLBEC 371 (LB FB)] had allowed the writ petitions and quashed the termination orders which were the subject matter of challenge in all the three writ petitions.

( 2 ) AGGRIEVED by the judgment the respondent in the writ petition had preferred Special Leave petitions before the Supreme Court. The Special Leave Petition filed in the case of Ramchandra nath was got dismissed as withdrawn. The order of Honble Supreme Court is dated 21 August, 1989. The petitioner of review petition thereafter has filed review petition alongwith an application under Section 5 of t






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top