SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 864

D.C.SRIVASTAVA
KABIRAN – Appellant
Versus
RIYAZUDDIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
FAREED UDDIN, IQBAL AHMED, M.A.QADEER, M.ISLAM, N.BOKHARI, S.G.HASNAIN, S.Khan, VINOD SINHA

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs second appeal.


( 2 ) THE brief facts are that Smt. Kabiran and her two sons filed a suit for recovery of possession of a disputed house No. 250 situated in Mohalla-Bunkar Nagar, Islamabad. Meerut against the defendant Riyaz Uddin on the allegation that the plaintiffs being the owners of the house, on the request of the defendant who is related to the plaintiff and is maternal grandson of the plaintiff no. 1, granted licence to occupy the disputed house along with plaintiff No. 1 in August, 1983. The defendant promised to vacate the house as and when required by the plaintiff No. 1. But the defendant subsequently changed his mind. In February, 1987, the plaintiff No. 1 requested the defendant to vacate the house but he was evading the request. Notices were also given but with no result, Licence was ultimately revoked through notice dated 18. 8. 1987. Since the defendant did not vacate the house, suit for his dispossession was filed.

( 3 ) THE suit was resisted on various grounds by the defendant. The main ground of contest which is relevant for the purposes of this second appeal is that the defendant claimed title in the house under oral


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top