SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 1100

D.C.SRIVASTAVA
AKBARI BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
MOHD. FAROOK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.A.QADEER, PREM CHANDRA, S.M.DAYAL

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is defendants second appeal.


( 2 ) THE brief facts are that the plaintiff Mohd. Faruque filed a suit for recovery of possession of the property mentioned in Schedule a of the plaint against the defendant Manjoor Ahmad, on the ground that the plaintiff was the owner of the property under a registered gift-deed dated 6th september, 1958. The defendant Manjoor Ahmad was granted licence of the disputed portion on his request on licence fee of Rs. 10 per month only for six months. He, however, did not vacate the property and also failed to pay the licence fee with effect from 16th August. 1982. The licence was revoked by the plaintiff through the notice dated 16th March, 1983. Again neither the balance licence fee was paid nor the portion was vacated.

( 3 ) THE suit was contested on the ground that no licence was granted by the plaintiff and that the defendant was the owner of the house and it was in possession of his forefathers as well and long possession for more than 100 years, conferred title upon the defendant in the disputed property. It was also pleaded that since at the time of abolition of Zamindari, the defendant was in possession of the house,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top