SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 939

J.C.GUPTA
KAILASH CHANDRA JAIN – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH CHANDRA NAGPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.AGRAWAL

J. C. GUPTA, J.


( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against the order dated 10. 12. 96 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition)and the order dated 30. 8. 96 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) passed by respondent No. 2 in revision filed by the petitioner under Section 25 of the Small Cause Courts Act.

( 2 ) THE facts may be stated in a narrow compass. The petitioner filed suit for arrears of rent and ejectment against the respondent No. 1 on the ground of default in payment of rent. The respondent No. 1 denied the existence of relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and further alleged that there were no arrears of rent as the same were paid to the house owner smt. Kripa Devi and after her the rent was realized by her sons and daughters. The trial court, however, repelled the defence and decreed the suit in favour of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said decree, respondent No. 1 filed revision under Section 25 of the Small Cause Courts Act. During the pendency of revision, an application for bringing on record some rent receipts as additional evidence was moved on behalf of respondent No. 1. By the order, dated 30. 8. 96, the said application was allowed and thereafter by



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top