SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 1220

P.K.JAIN
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
RAVINDRA PAL SINGH LEKHPAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.ASTHANA

P. K. JAIN, J.


( 1 ) HEARD learned Additional Government Advocate and Sri R. K. Asthana, learned counsel for the respondent.

( 2 ) THE respondent was tried in Special Case No. 2 of 1987 for offences under Sections 161, I. P. C. and 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and acquitted by the trial Court (Vth Addl. Sessions Judge, Aligarh) by judgment and order dated 26-11-1992. It is this judgment and order of the trial Court which is being challenged in this appeal.

( 3 ) ON 16-1-1986 an application (Ex. Ka-1) was given by Virendra Singh and Tej Pal Pal to Sri Ram Kumar Tyagi, Inspector Vigilance, district Aligarh. The said application contained endoresement of Sri D. P. Mishra, A. D. M. Aligarh regarding arranging of trap. The allegations in the complaint were that both Virendra Singh and Tej Pal had applied loan from the Bank under the free boring scheme for small land holders. When the complainants did not receive any information about sanction of loan for 7 months they approached Gram Sewak who told them that they will have to obtain share certificates from Lekhpal of their area. At the relevant time Ravindra Pal Singh was Lekhpal of the area of the com-plainants. The complai













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top