SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 1487

D.K.SETH, PALOK BASU
ARUN KUMAR DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.AWASTHI, RAVI KIRAN JAIN

PALOK BASU AND D. K. SETH, JJ.


( 1 ) ARUN Kumar Dubey, petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the prayer that a writ in the nature of certiorari should issue quashing the notice dated 3. 12. 1997 (Annexure-2) and all proceedings consequential thereto. The other two prayers are that even the notice of intention dated 2. 12. 1997 (Annexure-3) may also be quashed and further that Section 87a of the U. P. Municipalities Act. 1916 be declared ultra vires the provisions of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) SRI Ravi Kiran Jain, learned senior advocate assisted by Sri R- K. Awasthi, has been heard at considerable length in support of this writ petition. Sri S. K. Lal has appeared on behalf of the opposite party No. 4.

( 3 ) THE facts are that on 30. 11. 1995, the petitioner took oath as Adhyaksha, Nagar Palika parishad, Mirzapur after having been elected in the elections held for that post. On 2. 12. 1997 it is alleged that a motion of no-confidence against the petitioner was signed in accordance with the provisions contained under Section 87a of the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916 (as amended from time to time ). The District Magistrate,




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top