SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
S. K. AGARWAL
SAMAYDIN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
CRI. MISC. APPLN. 1497 Of 1999
Decided On : 01/04/2001

Advocates Appeared:
D.R.CHOUDHURY, SUNIL A.KULKARNI

The main legal point established is that maintenance should normally be granted from the date of the order, and reasons must be provided for allowing it from the date of the application, as per Section 125(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Headnote:

Maintenance - Date of Order - The court discussed the interpretation of Section 125(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the grant of maintenance from the date of the order or the date of the application. The court emphasized that maintenance should normally be granted from the date of the order, unless extraordinary circumstances are present, and the court must provide reasons for allowing it from the date of the application.

Fact of the Case:

The learned IX Additional Sessions Judge modified the maintenance amount granted to the respondent from Rs. 500.00 to Rs. 400.00, without providing reasons for allowing maintenance from the date of the application.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the learned Magistrate did not provide any reason for allowing maintenance from the date of the application, and thus, modified the order to make the maintenance payable from the date of the order.

Issues: Interpretation of Section 125(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the grant of maintenance from the date of the order or the date of the application.

Ratio Decidendi: Maintenance should normally be granted from the date of the order, unless extraordinary circumstances are present, and the court must provide reasons for allowing it from the date of the application.

Final Decision: The court partly allowed the application and modified the order to make the maintenance payable from the date of the order.

S. K. AGARWAL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. , Sri Anoop Ghosh and have perused both the orders also.

( 2 ) THE order of the learned Judicial Magistrate granting maintenance of Rs. 500. 00 to the respondent from the date of the application has been modified by the learned IX Additional Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr, only to the extent of reducing the amount from Rs. 500. 00 to Rs. 400. 00.

( 3 ) ON examination of both the judgments, I do not find any serious infirmity in them nor any such infirmity was pointed out on behalf of the applicant. It is only urged that maintenance amount should be fixed from the date of the order as the law normally requires. If the Court intends to grant maintenance from the date of application Court must record its reasons for doing so. The contention has some force. Sub-sec. (2) of S. 125, Cr. P. C. spells as under :" (2) Such allowance shall be payable from the date of the order, or, if so ordered, from the date of the application for maintenance. "

( 4 ) FROM an examination of the language of this sub-section it clearly follows that in normal circumstances the maintenance must be granted from the date of the order. In only extraordinary circumstances, it may also be ordered to be paid from the date of application for maintenance. It is thus clear that there must be a discussion of suchcircumstances which warrant the Court to allow it from the date of application. No other inference is permissible from the language of sub-sec. (2 ). One such extraordinary circumstance may be dilatory tactics adhered to by the husband in the disposal of the proceeding. The other one may be untold cruelty practised against his wife. No extensive ground can be formulated for doing so. The learned Magistrate has not given any reason for allowing maintenance from the date of the application. Nowhere in the judgment before delivering the operative portion he had shown any such inclination. As a matter of fact the Court has taken the husband by surprise by making such a direction for the first time in the operative portion of the judgment. I am, under the circumstances, inclined to accept this contention and modify the order and make it payable from the date of order. The maintenance allowance shall be payable from the date of the order.

( 5 ) ACCORDINGLY this application is partly allowed. Application partly allowed.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top