SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 14

BHAGWAN DIN, SUDHIR NARAIN
SHEO PRASAD VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.R.AGRAWAL, Shambhu Chopra

SUDHIR NARAIN, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has sought to quash the order passed by respondent No. 1 dated October 29, 1987, rejecting the applications of the petitioner for making reference to this court under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts are that the petitioner-firm filed an income-tax return for the assessment year 1980-81. The Income-tax Officer concerned made certain additions on account of unexplained investment in purchase of sugar amounting to Rs. 49,500, The petitioner preferred an appeal against the said order. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Agra, partly allowed the appeal. Against the aforesaid order, two appeals were filed before the income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, respondent No. 2, one by the Income-tax Officer and the other by the petitioner. The Tribunal vide order dated March 31, 1987, dismissed the petitioners appeal but allowed the appeal filed by the Income-tax Officer.

( 3 ) THE petitioner filed two reference applications under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act before respondent No. 2 for referring the question of law arising out of the Tribunals order to this court along with an application to














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top