SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 78

U.K.DHAON
RAM PIYAREY – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.G.S.Parihar, N.K.Seth

U. K. DHAON, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri H. G. S. Parihar appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri N. K. Seth, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has approached this Court against the orders dated 17. 6. 1998 and 10. 6. 1998 by which the application of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground was rejected. The father of the petitioner was Cash Coolie in the State Bank of India at the time of his death. The petitioner submitted an application on the prescribed form for appointment on compassionate ground. The petitioner has alleged in the petition that the family possesses 16 biswas irrigated land and the family of the deceased consists of petitioner, widow of the deceased, four sisters and one brother.

( 3 ) SHRI H. G. S. Parihar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that after receiving the communication that the application has been rejected, a detailed representation was also filed, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure No. 13 to the writ petition, apprising the fact about the hardships faced by the family of the deceased. He further submits that the grounds mentioned for rejection of the application of the pe






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top