SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 195

V.M.SAHAI
SIDDHESHWAR SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
VICE-CHANCELLOR, BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KRISHNAJI SHUKLA, V.K.UPADHYA

V. M. SAHAI, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition filed by a candidate who appeared in Pre-Medical Test (in brief PMT)conducted by the Banaras Hindu University, from Nagpur centre, the short question that arises for consideration is whether there was any material on record from which the respondents could have concluded or even raise reasonable inference that the petitioner was guilty of breach of discipline or any other irregularity for which he could have been debarred from the PMT examination and deprived of the privileges of the university including withholding of his result of B. Pharma?

( 2 ) THE petitioner, admittedly, had appeared in Pre-Medical Test/pharmacy Admission Test (in brief PMT/pat) conducted by Banaras Hindu University (in brief University) in 1999. He could not get admission in PMT but he was declared successful in PAT. He was admitted in B. Pharma course and declared successful in B. Pharma first semester held in December, 1999 and secured grade point 7. 78. The examination for second semester was held in April, 2000. In June the petitioner appeared in PMT-2000. His candidature was cancelled by the Vice-Chancellor on 23. 6. 2000 and his privileges as a university student w























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top