SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 255

D.S.SINHA
BAL KRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
RAMANAND DIXIT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.AGRAWAL, K.K.DUBEY, Prakash Gupta

D. S. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri B. N. Agarwal. the learned counsel appearing for the defendant-applicant and Sri prakash Gupta, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-opposite parties.

( 2 ) INSTANT revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, as amended by the State of U. P. is directed against the order dated 16th September. 1989, passed by the judge. Small Causes Court/iv Additional District and Sessions Judge, Jhansi in Original Suit wo. 15 of 1988, Ramanand Dixit and another v. Bal Krishna.

( 3 ) THE impugned order was passed on the application No. 30-C moved by the plaintiff-opposite parties under Rule 5 of Order XV of the Code of Civil Procedure. 1908 (hereinafter called the code), and by the order the defence of the defendant-applicant has been struck off. The applicant seeks to assail the Impugned order on the following two grounds :

1. that the trial court has misconstrued the provisions of Order XV Rule 5 of the Code of Civil procedure and wrongly struck off the defence of the defendant-applicant inasmuch as under order XV, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, only admitted amount is to be deposited by the defendant-applicant but d


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top