SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 252

S.R.SINGH, D.R.CHAUDHARY
PHOOL CHAND YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.Yadav, RAJEEV MISRA

D. R. CHAUDHARY, J.

( 1 ) DR. Phool Chand Yadav, the petitioner herein, while working on the post of District Social welfare Officer, Sidharthnagar was served with an order dated 28. 9. 2000 (Annexure-8) issued by the State Government in exercise of its power under Rule 56 (c) of the Fundamental Rules, retiring him prematurely with immediately effect and three months salary was directed to be paid in lieu of the notice. The legality and validity of the order dated 28. 9. 2000 has been questioned by means of this writ petition.

( 2 ) THE facts, as borne out of the pleadings, are that the petitioner, while posted in the district ghazipur as District Social Welfare Officer, he went on medical leave from 25. 9. 1997. During leave period, his wife developed lever cancer which resulted in her death. When he went to join his duties, he was not allowed as one Ratan Kumar had been posted in his place by the Director, social Welfare. U. P. Lucknow. Aggrieved, the petitioner made a representation, which annoyed the Director Sri Kapil Dev who attached the petitioner to the office of the Director, Directorate of Social Welfare. U. P. . Lucknow. His attachment continued from January, 1999 up to
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top