G.P.MATHUR, BHAGWAN DIN
L. M. L. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing of the 15 per cent surcharge levied on the energy charge in the electricity bill of the petitioner for August, 2000.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is a company registered under the provisions of Companies Act and is engaged in manufacturing two wheelers (scooters and motor cycles ). The petitioner entered into an agreement with U. P. State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as UPSEB) on 31-10-1996 for supply of electrical energy in the form of a three phase alternative current at declared pressure of 132 KV and a power not exceeding 800 KV to its factory at A-1, Panki Industrial Area, Site III, Kanpur. The petitioner claims that it is running a non-continuous process industry and has to observe peak hour restirction and, consequently, it does not consume power from 6. 00 p. m. to 11-00 pm. A new tariff was enforced with effect from 9-8-2000 and in the bill dated 5-9-2000 a surcharge of Rs. 6,33,898. 45 was levied on total energy charge of Rs. 42,25,989. 68. The petitioner contends that as it is observing peak hour restriction and is not consuming power during the restricted hours
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.