SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 419

SUSHIL HARKAULI
SHAKUNTALA GOSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
. SAROJ CHAUDHARY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.GOSWAMI, T.P.SINGH

SUSHIL HARKAULI, J.

( 1 ) I have heard Sri T. P. Singh, senior advocate, who appeared for the petitioner before lunch and who desired that this case should be finally disposed of today itself. After lunch Sri T. P. Singh did not appear and Sri P. K. Goswami advocate representing the petitioner stated that he would argue the case. I have heard him also at great length. The relevant facts appearing from the available record are as follows.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was a teacher in the Government Girls Intermediate College, Phaphamau, District Allahabad. She was transferred by order dated 18-2-2000 to the Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Tharwai, District Pratapgarh. She filed a writ petition being Writ Petition No. 31852 of 2000 in which this Court passed the following interim order:"as an interim measure, it is provided that in case the impugned order dated 18-7-2000 (Annexure 3 to the petition) has not already been given effect to in accordance with law,the operation thereof shall remain stayed till further orders by this Court. It is also provided that pendency in the matter will not preclude the authorities for (from ?) reconsidering the matter in the event of representation


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top