M.KATJU, O.BHATT
R. K. SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR/appointing AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 22. 11. 1999 [annexure-1 to the petition) by which the petitioner has been removed from service.
( 2 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties.
( 3 ) THE petitioner was appointed as Research Assistant in Govind Ballabh Pant Social Science institute. Jhusi. Allahabad (hereinafter called the institute) on 10. 1. 1990 in a permanent capacity. He was issued a charge-sheet dated 4. 5. 1999 uide Annexure-2 to the petition. It is alleged by the petitioner that the charge-sheet is wholly vague inas- much as the periods of the dates on which the petitioner was allegedly absent without leave or had allegedly made signatures in the attendance Register even after a cross was put in by the authority was absent.
( 4 ) IT is further alleged in paragraph 4 of the petition that the allegation that the petitioner was in the habit of writing objectionable and undesirable letters to the authorities is also vague and so is the third allegation that the petitioner wilfully neglected his duty. The allegation that the petitioner terrorized the labourers and committed the crime of extorting money was also vague as n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.