( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri V. M. Zaidi, at length.

( 2 ) PERUSED the averments made in the writ petition together with the annexures filed in support of the writ petition.

( 3 ) IT is contended by Sri V. M. Zaidi, learned counsel for the petitioners, that the records of the whole village had been manipulated and in such a situation, the petitioners would be satisfied if the inquiry report submitted by the Joint Director of Consolidation is implemented in letter and spirit.

( 4 ) THE aforesaid contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not acceptable for the reasons given herein below.

( 5 ) IT is conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the correction of the records during consolidation operation is based on judicial pronouncements of Consolidation authorities. No corrections in the revenue records during consolidation operation can be incorporated without judicial orders passed by the Consolidation Authorities as envisaged under u. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. Entries incorporated on the basis of judicial orders are made subject to appeal and revision under the said Act.

( 6 ) IT is well to remember that a