B.K.RATHI
SHAHEEN PARVEEN – Appellant
Versus
IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MEERUT – Respondent
( 1 ) THE respondents Nos. 3 and 4 filed S. C. C. Suit No. 22 of 1997 against the petitioners in the Court of Judge Small Causes Court, Meerut for eviction and for2 recovery of arrears of rent. The eviction was sought alleging that the premises in suit was constructed in the year 1990. The suit having been filed in the year 1997, the provisions of U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972 does not apply to the premises in suit. The suit for eviction as well as for recovery of arrears of rent was decreed by Judge Small Causes Court, Meerut on 18-7-1998 by judgment, Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition. Aggrieved by it the petitioners preferred S. C. C. revision No. 375 of 1998, which have been dismissed by respondent No. 1 on 30-3-1999 by judgment, Annexure No. 9 to the writ petition. Aggrieved by the orders, the petitioners have preferred this writ petition invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the request that both the orders, Annexures Nos. 8 and 9 to the writ petition be quashed and the suit of the respondents Nos. 3 and 4 be dismissed with costs.
( 2 ) I have heard Sri K. K. Arora, learned counsel for the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.