SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 827

R.H.ZAIDI
ARUN KUMAR CHOUBEY – Appellant
Versus
ADMINISTRATOR, NAGAR PALIKA, MIRZAPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.R.Dube, S.N.SHUKLA

R. H. ZAIDI, J.


( 1 ) IN all the above noted petitions, common questions of law and fact are involved, they were, therefore, heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. Writ Petition No. 36179 of 1991, shall be the leading case.

( 2 ) BY means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 28. 11. 1991, whereby the Administrator of Nagar Palika, Mirzapur, has terminated the services of the petitioner in exercise of power under Rule 11 of the Rules, known as the U. P. Municipal board Services [inquiry, Punishment and Termination of Services) Rules, for short "the Rules.

( 3 ) THE relevant facts of the case giving rise to the present petition. In brief, are that, according to the petitioner, he was appointed as clerk grade II on daily wage basis for a period of three months only by the then President of the Municipal Board, Mirzapur, by order dated 1. 6. 1990. The term of the petitioner is alleged to have been extended by the President by order dated 20. 9. 1990. Therefore, it is stated that the petitioner was appointed as cler


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top