SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 1002

U.S.TRIPATHI
PAPPU SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.MISHRA

U. S. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision has been directed against the judgment and order dated 4-10-2001 passed by Sri N. B. Singh, Special Judge, SC/st Act, Court No. 3, Deoria in Special Trial No. 52 of 2001, convicting the applicant under Section 3 (1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 only.

( 2 ) THE prosecution story briefly stated was that on 20-9-92 at about 7. 00 p. m. at Kasba Bhatpar Rani, P. S. Bhatpar Rani, District Deoria, the applicant voluntarily caused hurt to Ashok Kumar and also threatened him to kill. He lodged a report of the said occurrence. On the basis of the report a case under Section 323/506 IPC and Section 3 (1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (hereinafter called the Act) was registered. After investigation the police submitted charge-sheet. During trial before the special Judge the prosecution examined Ashok Kumar (PW 1), Ram Nandan (PW 2), Ram Cheej (PW 3) and Nandani Prasad (PW 4 ). The learned special Judge on considering evidence of the prosecution found that the offences punishable under Section 323/506









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top