SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 1061

R.H.ZAIDI
JANGI LAL – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ABDUL QADAR, Haider Husain, Sankatha Rai, SATISH CHATURVEDI

R. H. ZAIDI, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 8. 12. 1972 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Allahabad. Prayer for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to act in accordance with law has also been made.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts of the case giving rise to the present petition are that in the basic year, khata No. 158 was recorded in the name of the petitioner, Jangi Lal. On receipt of C. H. Form no. 5, objection was filed by Miru, respondent No. 4, claiming that he was the co-tenure holder to the extent of 1/2 share in the said Khata on the basis of pedigree which is given below : deena reepubhuwar smt. Murli (daughter) Meeru (respondent No. 4)Masuriadeen (Son)Jangi Lal (Petitioner)

( 3 ) IT was pleaded by respondent No. 4 that he was the son of the brother of petitioner and he was entitled to 1/2 share, therefore, the basic year entry was liable to be expunged and the names of contesting respondent No. 4 as well as Jangi Lal, petitioner were liable to















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top