SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 1168

R.P.MISHRA, G.P.MATHUR
NARENDRA KUMAR RAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJESH TANDON, SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, T.P.SINGH

G. P. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing the order of transfer dated 8. 8. 2001 by which the petitioner was transferred from district Chandauli to lucknow and was attached with the office of Transport Commissioner. U. P.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was previously working as Incharge Assistant Regional Transport Officer at varanasi but he was transferred to the headquarters at Lucknow on 20. 4. 2001. On 15. 6. 2001, he was again transferred as Assistant Regional Transport Officer (Enforcement), Chandauli. By the impugned order dated 8. 8. 2001, he was transferred to Lucknow and was attached to the headquarters.

( 3 ) SRI. T. P. Singh has submitted that the petitioner has been transferred several times within a brief period which was contrary to the policy and the guidelines laid down by the State government by the Government Order dated 21. 4. 2001, a copy of which has been filed as annexure-9 to the writ petition. The Government Order lays down the guidelines which have to be followed in the matter of transfer of Government employees and paragraph 6 thereof provides that as far as possible, no transfer order should be passed af







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top