SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 1150

BHAGWAN DIN
UDAI NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CBI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIRESHVAR NATH, NANDITA, SRIVASTAVA

BHAGWAN DIN, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a criminal revision directed against the order dated 25. 7. 2001 passed by the Special Judge. Anticorruption (Central), U. P. Lucknow in Criminal Case No. 39 of 1998, State v. Udai Narain and Another by which the Trial Court rejected the objection raised by the accused revisionist and held that the prosecution sanction dated 8. 5. 1996 accorded againstthe accused revisionist by Tarsem Lal, the Under Secretary, Government of India is complete and valid.

( 2 ) THE facts and the circumstances giving rise to the present revision as narrated in the charge- sheet are that revisionist Udai Narain was functioning as Additional Collector, Central Excise at Allahabad/lucknow during November, 1993 and while functioning as such on 8. 11. 1993. Shri N. P. Tiwari, Dy. S. P. (CBI) accompanied by Inspectors B. C. Shanna: Ashok Babu, Haripal Sehgal. Chief Manager. PNB, Sadar Bazar Branch. Lucknow, A. A. Kazmi, Dy. Manager, (Vig.) PCI, RO, Lucknow, C. A. Ram Sundaram, Manager, PNB, Zonal Office, Lucknow intercepted a Fiat. Car bearing Registration No. MEN-14 accompanied by the revisionist and the coaccused Abdul Aziz Sreshamwala at Amausi Airport and saw the transaction



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top