BHAGWAN DIN
UDAI NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CBI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a criminal revision directed against the order dated 25. 7. 2001 passed by the Special Judge. Anticorruption (Central), U. P. Lucknow in Criminal Case No. 39 of 1998, State v. Udai Narain and Another by which the Trial Court rejected the objection raised by the accused revisionist and held that the prosecution sanction dated 8. 5. 1996 accorded againstthe accused revisionist by Tarsem Lal, the Under Secretary, Government of India is complete and valid.
( 2 ) THE facts and the circumstances giving rise to the present revision as narrated in the charge- sheet are that revisionist Udai Narain was functioning as Additional Collector, Central Excise at Allahabad/lucknow during November, 1993 and while functioning as such on 8. 11. 1993. Shri N. P. Tiwari, Dy. S. P. (CBI) accompanied by Inspectors B. C. Shanna: Ashok Babu, Haripal Sehgal. Chief Manager. PNB, Sadar Bazar Branch. Lucknow, A. A. Kazmi, Dy. Manager, (Vig.) PCI, RO, Lucknow, C. A. Ram Sundaram, Manager, PNB, Zonal Office, Lucknow intercepted a Fiat. Car bearing Registration No. MEN-14 accompanied by the revisionist and the coaccused Abdul Aziz Sreshamwala at Amausi Airport and saw the transaction
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.