SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 1126

B.K.RATHI
PREM KUMARI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
RAJ MANI DUBEY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Srivastava, RAJESH TANDON, RAVI KIRAN JAIN, Som Nath Seth

B. K. RATHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision under S. 25 Provincial Small Causes Court Act have been preferred against the order, dated 6-8-2001 passed by the XVIII Additional District Judge/small Causes Court, Allahabad in Suit No. 2/2001, by which he rejected the application of the revisionist 15-C under Order 1, Rule 10 C. P. C. for impleading her as party. The facts of the case are as follows:

( 2 ) THE opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2 filed the above Suit No. 2/2001 against the opposite parties Nos. 3 and 4 for eviction from the disputed building and for recovery of arrears of rent. The Suit is pending in the Court of the Additional District Judge, who is exercising the powers of the Judge, Small Causes Court for this suit. The revisionist moved an application 15-C under Order 1, Rule X C. P. C. for her impleadment. It is alleged that she is daughter of Dr. Ishwari prasad who was the owner and landlord of the property in dispute. He in his life-time on 29-10-1984 executed a registered Will of the property in favour of the applicant, his only daughter; that it was the last Will of Dr. Ishwari Prasad and, therefore, after his death she has become the owner and the landlady of the premises in





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top