SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 27

A.K.YOG
AJAY KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE GOVERNMENT OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.Naik, B.S.Kulshrestha, P.C.SINGH, S.A.SHAH, S.C.DWIVEDI

A. K. YOG, J.

( 1 ) ONE Shyam Bihari Lal Sharma was an employee on Class III post as Village Development officer alleged to be a civil post of Government of U. P. at Block Bahadarabad, district haridwar. Unfortunately he died on 9. 2. 1990 leaving behind him the petitioner (Ajay Kumar sharma) and three other sons as mentioned in para 4 of the writ petition.

( 2 ) IN the writ petition, it has been categorically stated that petitioner was given appointment on compassionate ground under relevant Dying in Harness Rules. 1974. which were applicable to the facts of the instant case. This fact has not been disputed by the respondent in the counter-affidavit. A copy of the appointment letter has been filed on 25. 5. 1990 which has been filed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. In pursuance of the aforementioned appointment letter, the petitioner joined the post of peon on 7. 6. 1990, the appointment letter, however, mentioned that appointment of the petitioner was temporary.

( 3 ) BY the order dated 26. 9. 1995, filed as Annexure-3 to the petition issued by Block development Officer, Bahadarabad, district Haridwar indicates that the petitioner was appointed on 7. 6. 1990 and thereafter he










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top