IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
J. C. GUPTA, S. K. AGARWAL
RASHID - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
Criminal Appeal 2541 Of 1980
Decided On : 02/17/2000
Conviction - Section 302 IPC - [302, 34 IPC] - The court acquitted the appellants of the charges under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code based on the medical discrepancy and unreliable testimony of the prosecution witnesses.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Ishwar Singh. The prosecution's case was based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the medical evidence indicated a discrepancy in the prosecution's version of the incident, and the testimony of the eyewitnesses was unreliable and contradictory.
Issues: The key issues were the reliability of the eyewitness testimony, the medical evidence, and the presence of a motive for the crime.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the medical discrepancy and the unreliable and contradictory testimony of the eyewitnesses to acquit the appellants of the charges.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellants of the charges. The appellants were not required to surrender, and their bail bonds were cancelled.
( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by appellants Rashid and Shazid against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34, I. P. C. and sentence of life imprisonment by the judgment and order dated 25-10-1980 passed by Sri I. P. Singh, IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut in S. T. No. 253 of 1980.
( 2 ) THE prosecution case, in brief, is that at about 6. 15 a. m. on 22-3-1980 Ishwar Singh was returning after having eased himself in the field situate on the East of Rajbaha (canal drainage) along with Rishi Pal, Brijpal Singh, Kiran Singh, Dhara and Jagvir Singh. As he was trying to cross on the footpath of this drain, he was fired upon by Rashid and Shazid. These two appellants were covering themselves with a cotton sheet. Their eyes were only exposed. The weapons were concealed underneath the cover. The incident was witnessed by the above said persons. Out of them P. W. 1 Rishi Pal, PW 3, Brijpal Singh and PW 4, Kiran Singh were examined by the prosecution as eye witnesses of the incident. Ishwar Singh, deceased fell down on the Patri of the drain and he was placed on a cot and brought to the house of the deceased. From there he was placed on a tractor and an attempt was made to take him to the police station. On way to Mawana near the crusher of Vijay Singh, Ishwar Singh succumbed to his injuries. Informant Rishi Pal scribed the report Ext. Ka 1 at that very place and thereafter, he in company of some other villagers, took the dead body to the police station and filed his written report there.
( 3 ) ON the basis of the said written report, chick report and other formalities pertaining to the registration of the case were completed by Head Moharrir Jai Chand in the presence of S. I. Yogendra Pal Singh, PW 6, S. I. prepared the inquest report and completed other formalities. The dead body was thereafter sent for postmortem. He afterwards reached the village of incident and recorded the statements of Brijpal Singh and Kiran Singh and went to the site of occurrence, inspected the same, prepared a sketch map and the inspection memo. He also collected blood-stained and simple earth and Lota, which according to theprosecution was in possession of the deceased at the time of incident. The necessary recovery memos of the abovesaid articles were prepared. After conclusion of the investigation charge-sheet was submitted by another S. I. Jag Roshan Singh, who had taken over the investigation from the abovesaid S. I. , PW 6.
( 4 ) THE post-mortem on the body of the deceased was conducted by PW 2, Dr. P. N. Khanna. He found following ante-mortem injuries on the person of the victim :1. Gunshot wounds of entry (4 in number) in an area of 51/2 cm. x 41/2 cm. x abdominal cavity deep on the right side of abdomen 7 cm. from the umbilicus. Maximum size 1. 5 cm. x 1 cm. and minimum size 1/10 cm. The injuries were directed from below upwards and the scorching was present around the injuries. 2. Gunshot wound of entry 1 cm. x 1 cm. x abdominal cavity deep on the right side of lower part of chest at 9 Oclock position. Scorching was present around the injury. 3. Gunshot wound of entry 1/2 cm. x 1/2 cm. x skin deep on the upper part of right side of abdomen 4 cm. above injury No. 1. Scorching was present around the injury. 4. Gunshot wound of entry 1/2 cm. x 1/2 cm. x muscle deep on the right side of outer part of chest 4 cm. from nipple when measured obliquely. Scorching was present around the injury.
( 5 ) GUNSHOT wounds of entry (2 in number) 4 cm. apart on the upper part of right thigh. Maximum size 1 cm. x 1 cm. skin deep and the scorching was present around the injuries.
( 6 ) GUNSHOT wounds of entry (2 in number) 2 cm. apart on the middle of outer part of right thigh. Maximum size 1/2 cm. x 1/2 cm. and minimum size 1/4 cm. x 1/4 cm. Both the injuries were skin deep and scorching was present around the injury. 5. In all the injuries scorching was present. On initial examination he found pertioneum to be lacerated. Liver and both the
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.