SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 389

G.P.MATHUR, A.K.YOG
SHASHI DUTT PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
BALESHWAR TYAGI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DINESH DWIVEDI, N.D.RAI

G. P. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant, an employee of U. P. Basic Shiksha Parishad was transferred from district ballia to district Gonda by the order dated 8. 2. 1999 passed by Secretary, U. P. Basic Shiksha parishad, Allahabad. This order was challenged by him by filing Writ Petition No. 15098 of 1999, which was dismissed by a learned single Judge on 15. 7. 1999. Feeling aggrieved by the dismissal of the writ petition, the appellant has preferred this special appeal.

( 2 ) SRI Dinesh Dwivedi has submitted that the appellant was appointed as Assistant Clerk in Zlla parishad. Ballia on 4. 7. 1967 and after the enforcement of U. P. Basic Education Act, 1972, he became an employee of U. P. Basic Shtksha Parishad. Thereafter, he could not be transferred to any place outside Ballia. The relevant parts of subsections (1) and (3) of Section 9 of U. P. Basic education Act. 1972, read as follows :

"transfer of Employees.-- (1) On and from the appointed day every teacher, officer and other employees serving under a local body exclusively in connection with basic schools (including any supervisory or inspecting staff) immediately before the said day shall be transferred to and become a teacher







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top