SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 351

M.KATJU, D.R.CHAUDHARY
RAM PRATAP SONKAR – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SRIVASTAVA, T.P.SINGH

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed against the Impugned dismissal order dated 30. 12. 1997 annexure-10 to the writ petition and the order dated 28. 3. 1998 Annexure-12 to the writ petition.

( 2 ) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was in the service of the Allahabad Bank and was an officer in junior management grade-1 and was posted as Assistant Manager. He was given a charge-sheet dated 29. 7. 1994 vide Annexure-2 to the writ petition and he was suspended by the order dated 21. 1. 1994 vide Annexure-3 to the writ petition. A perusal of the charge-sheet shows that serious allegations of financial irregularities were made against the petitioner. Thereafter, an enquiry was held in which he was given an opportunity of hearing and the enquiry officer submitted a report copy of which Is Annexure-8 to the writ petition. On the basis of the said report, the petitioner was dismissed and his appeal was also rejected.


( 4 ) SRI T. P. Singh learned counsel for the petitioner only addressed us on the quantum of punishment and submitted that the punishment was disproportionate to the offence. He relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Ka













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top