SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 561

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
R. R. K. TRIVEDI, M. C. JAIN
RAMA SHANKER - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
Criminal Appeal 1018 Of 1993
Decided On : 04/17/2000

Advocates Appeared:
D.S.TEVARI, N.N.Singh, P.N.Misra

The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Exception 4 of S. 300, I. P. C., and the subsequent classification of the offence under Part I of S. 304, I. P. C.

Headnote:

Self-Defence - Criminal Law - S. 302, S. 149, S. 148, S. 147, S. 323, S. 304 - The judgment discusses the application of S. 302, S. 149, S. 148, S. 147, S. 323, and S. 304 of the Indian Penal Code in the context of a case involving a fatal altercation. The court analyzed the evidence to determine the culpability of the accused and their actions under the relevant sections of the IPC.

Fact of the Case:

The incident involved a fatal altercation resulting in the deaths of two individuals and injuries to others. The accused were convicted under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, and the prosecution presented evidence of the sequence of events leading to the altercation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that only two of the accused were the actual assailants, while the others were present as interveners. It concluded that the deaths were a result of a sudden fight without premeditation, and the actions of the two assailants fell under Exception 4 of S. 300, I. P. C.

Issues: The key issues revolved around the culpability of the accused, the nature of the altercation, and the applicability of the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the assailants' actions fell under Exception 4 of S. 300, I. P. C., and the offence committed was punishable under Part I of S. 304, I. P. C. It also acquitted the interveners based on the evidence presented.

Final Decision: The court modified the judgment, convicting the actual assailants under S. 304, Part I, I. P. C., and sentencing them to ten years of rigorous imprisonment. The interveners were acquitted of the charges.

M. C. JAIN, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed by five appellants 1. Rama Shankar, 2. Doodh Nath, 3. Ram Jeet, 4. Ram Janam and 5. Baijnath against the judgment and order dated 29/05/1993 passed by Sri S. M. Pandey, the then Special Judge/additional Sessions Judge, Ballia in Sessions Trial No. 159 of 1985. Rama Shanker and Ram Jeet have been convicted under S. 302, I. P. C. and sentenced to life imprisonment and the remaining three have been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under S. 302, I. P. C. read with S. 149, I. P. C. The accused-appellants-Rama Shankar, Ram Jeet and Ram Janam have further been convicted under S. 148, I. P. C. and each of them has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years. The remaining accused-appellants have been convicted under S. 147, I. P. C. and each of them has been sentenced to one years rigorous imprisonment. The accused-appellant-Doodh Nath has been convicted under S. 323, I. P. C. and sentenced to nine months rigorous imprisonment whereas the remaining accused-appellants have been convicted under S. 323 read with S. 149, I. P. C. and each of them has been sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment. All the substantive sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

( 2 ) ALONG with the accused-appellants five others, namely, Keshav, Deep Chand, Ramesh, Prem Chand and Shyamu were also tried but they were acquitted. The lives of two persons, namely, Ramesh and Nayak had been cut short in this incident and the informant Ram Awadh P. W. 1 had sustained injuries. The incident took place on 17-6-1985 at about 8. 30 a. m. in village Khuta Bahorwa, Police Station Bhimpura, District Ballia. The First Information Report was lodged by the injured Ram Awadh P. W. 1 at 10. 05 a. m. The distance of the Police Station from the place of occurrence was three miles.

( 3 ) THE prosecution case as emerging from the First Information Report and the evidence adduced in the Court was that the informant Ram Awadh had his agricultural field in the north eastern side of his house and well in which he had sown paddy seed the day preceding the day of incident. On the day of the incident at about 7. 30 a. m. , the son of accused-Baijnath threw brick bats and pieces of stones in his said field. Ram Awadh P. W. 1 was standing at his well at that time and he asked Baijnaths son not to do so. Thereupon, all the accused persons rushed up and started assaulting him. Rama Shankar, Ram Jeet and Ram Janam appellants were armed with Pharsas. Prem Chand and Shyamu (acquitted) were armed with spears. The rest had lathis. His son Ramesh and brother Nayak came to his rescue. Rama Shankar assaulted Ramesh with Pharsa and cut his arm. Ram Jeet assaulted Nayak with Pharsa and his arm was also cut. Doodh Nath assaulted Ram Awadh with lathi. The remaining accused persons also alleged participated in the assault. He ran inside his house but the accused persons reached there too with their weapons. The incident was witnessed by Pati Ram, Nanku and several others of the village. The woman-folk and children of his family also threw brick bats and stone ballasts on the accused persons. The accused persons left the scene. The badly injured Ramesh and Nayak were placed on cots and Ram Awadh P. W. 1 took them to the Police Station. There he lodged the First Information Report Ex. Ka1. The injured were sent to the hospital for medical examination and treatment. Thereafter, Ramesh and Nayak were taken to Ballia because of their serious condition. Ramesh died before reaching Ballia, Nayak was alive till he was taken to District hospital, Ballia but he also died of the injuries in the evening. Consequent upon the death of Ramesh and Nayak the case was converted, inter alia, under S. 304, I. P. C.

( 4 ) IT would be relevant here to state that Nayak was examined at P. H. C. Nagra by Dr. R. C. Prasad P. W. 5 on 17-6-1985 at 12. 10 p. m. The following injuries were found on his person : 1. Incised wound on the left side of sho





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top