SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 506

BHANWAR SINGH, S.H.A.RAZA
NASIMUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.S.L.Srivastava

BHANWAR SINGH, J.


( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed by Nasimuddin. who was elected Chairman of Nagar Palika, chandpur, Bijnore, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the Impugned orders dated 22. 7. 1999 and 9. 9. 1999. passed by the government of U. P. and the District Magistrate. Bijnore, respectively. Another writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the working of the petitioner as adhyaksh, Nagar Pallka Parlshad. Chandpur, district Bijnore has been sought.

( 2 ) THE matrix of the petitioners case is that he was elected as Chairman of Chandpur Nagar pallka Parishad and took oath of his office on 1. 12. 1995. He discharged his duty satisfactorily for more than two years. However. In March, 1998. the District Magistrate, Bijnore. directed the additional District Magistrate (Finance) to hold an enquiry against the petitioner on an unsigned and undated complaint. Under the pressure of the political heavy weights, the enquiry officer initiated enquiry proceedings without informing the petitioner and he conducted and concluded the entire proceeding behind his back without giving

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top