SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 666

V.M.SAHAI
BAJRANG PRASAD SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
U. P. PARIYOJANA PRABANDHAK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C.RAJVANSHI, Umesh Chandra Mishra

V. M. SAHAI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner was appointed as Lab Assistant in 1975 in U. P. State Bridge Corporation, lucknow (in brief corporation ). He was confirmed in 1989. He was elected as Vice-President of the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Setu Nigam Sanyukt Karamchari Sangh. Shakha. Etawah on 2. 11. 1993. He was posted on 28. 12. 1933 at Ahnaiya Setu Moonj Rampura, Etawah. On 7. 4. 1994 he got information that a dacity had taken place in the night of 6. 4. 1994 on the workers who were working at Kursaua Tamairi Road where construction work of Sirsa River Bridge was going on. He being Vice-President of the Union, rushed to the place of incident. After some time Deputy project Manager Shri Hemant Kumar Chauhan/respondent No. 2 (in brief Shri Chauhan) also reached there. The petitioner apprised him of the incident and requested to lodge a report with the police. But Shri Chauhan did not agree. On the contrary, he became annoyed and enquired from the petitioner as to why he had reached there. According to the petitioner, Shri Chauhan even misbehaved with the petitioner, therefore, he was compelled to write against him on 8. 4. 1984 to respondent No. 1 with copy to District Magistrate, Chief Dev
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top