( 1 ) THE order dated 10th July. 1998, passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)Second Court. Mathura, in Original Suit No. 71 of 1992 has been challenged. By the said order, the revisionists application for amendment, which is Annexure-II to the said application has since been rejected. Mr. Rakesh Bahadur, learned counsel for the revisionist contends that in view of the amendment that was allowed in the plaint as Is apparent from paragraph 1 of the amended plaint, Thakur Govind Dev Ji Maharaj has been described as the owner of the property to whom the plaintiffs are paying rent. Therefore, in order to prove their title, it has become necessary to implead Sebalt of Thakur Govind Dev Jl Maharaj, and. therefore, by means of amendment, it was sought to implead one Anjan Kumar Dev Goswami as party defendant to the proceeding with the added amendments to the extent that the said Anjan Kumar Dev Goswaml who is Sebait of Thakur Govind Dev Ji Maharaj had threatened the plaintiff of dispossession on 31st March. 1998 and that the cause of action had arose on 31st March. 1998. when the plaintiff was threatened of dispossession. Therefore, this amendment should have