IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
R. R. K. TRIVEDI, M. C. JAIN
SATPAL - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
CRIMINAL APPEAL 2468 Of 1980
Decided On : 04/24/2000
Criminal Law - Conviction under Section 302, 452, and 323 IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 302, Section 34, Section 452, Section 323 - The court discussed the application of Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 452 IPC, and Section 323 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The court analyzed the evidence and found the accused guilty under Section 325 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and Section 452 IPC.
Fact of the Case:
The incident involved the murder of Jai Prakash and injuries to Santosh. The accused were convicted under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, 452 IPC, and 323 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The court analyzed the delayed F.I.R., witness testimony, and injuries sustained by the accused and victims.
Finding of the Court:
The court rejected the theory of self-defense put forth by the accused and convicted them under Section 325 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and Section 452 IPC.
Issues: The issues involved the delayed F.I.R., witness testimony, injuries sustained by the accused and victims, and the theory of self-defense.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the delayed F.I.R. was justified due to the priority of providing medical aid to the injured. The court also rejected the theory of self-defense and found the accused guilty under Section 325 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and Section 452 IPC.
Final Decision: The court altered the conviction of the accused to Section 325 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and 452 IPC. The accused were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and fines were imposed. The court directed the distribution of the fine amount to the widow or sons of the deceased and canceled the bail of the accused.
( 1 ) THERE are four appellants in this appeal, namely, Satpal, Janeshwar, Virendra Kumar alias Pappu and Madan Pal. They have preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 31-10-80 passed by Sri Vishnu Chandra, the then V Additional Sessions Judge, Saharanpur in Sessions Trial No. 226 of 1980. Each of them has been convicted under Section 302 I. P. C. read with Section 34 I. P. C. , 452 I. P. C. and 323 IPC read with Section 34 I. P. C. The sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to each of them under Section 302 I. P. C. read with Section 34 I. P. C. , two years rigorous imprisonment under Section 452 I. P. C. and one years rigorous imprisonment under Section 323 I. P. C. read with Section 34 I. P. C.
( 2 ) THE incident took place on 6-3-80 at about 8. 30 a. m. in the Gher of deceased Jai Prakash, situated in village Kuradi, Police Station Deoband, District Saharanpur. Jai Prakash was murdered in this incident and injuries were caused to the informant Santosh P. W. 1 - brother of the deceased. The report had been lodged by Santosh P. W. 1 by oral narration at Police Station Deoband on 6-3-80 at 5. 37 p. m. The distance of the Police Station from the place of occurrence was about 5 miles. The prosecution case, as unfolded from the F. I. R. and evidence adduced in the Court, may be narrated thus: Jai Prakash deceased, Santosh P. W. 1 and the accused persons belonged to the same Khandan. In the evening of 5-3-80, Jai Prakash deceased and Santosh P. W. 1 were loading sugarcane in a trolley at their sugarcane field. Their wheat field was adjacent. He buffalo of Satya Pal accused started causing damage to their wheat field. They asked Satya Pal to keep the he-buffalo properly tied to prevent damage to their crop. Satya Pal took out the he-buffalo but exchange of hot words took place between him on one hand and Jai Prakash and his brother on the other. Satya Pal also held out a threat that he would see them in the village. On the next day at about 8. 30 a. m. , Jai Prakash and Santosh were sitting and smoking Hukka in their Gher where all the four accused persons came. Out of them, Madan Pal was armed with Balkati (a sharp edged weapon) while others were armed with lathis. They started assaulting Jai Prakash and Santosh with their respective weapons. At the start, it was Madan Lal who had given a Balkati blow on the head of Jai Prakash. In self-defence, Jai Prakash picked up an axe which he wielded. Santosh also picked up a lathi which he wielded in self-defence. An alarm was raised by Santosh which attracted Babu Ram PW 2, Brahm Datt and Rajendra who witnessed the occurrence and intervened. The accused then ran away. Jai Prakash had become unconscious at the spot itself. Santosh with the help of Babu Ram P. W. 2 took Jai Prakash to the hospital at Deoband. Both of them were medically examined by Dr. B. R. Kamal PW 3. The injuries of Jai Prakash were examined at 12 Oclock noon and those of Santosh at 12. 30 p. m. As per injury report of Jai Prakash Ext. Ka-2 he had sustained the following injuries: 1. Incised wound 7. 5 cm x 1/2 cm x bone deep on the right side of head 12 cm above from right ear, there was bleeding from wound. Margins were clean cut directed from upward to downward. 2. Lacerated wound 3 cm x 1 cm x scalp deep on front and left side of skull 6 cm above from left eyebrow. There was bleeding from wound.
( 3 ) SWELLING 12 cm x 5 cm on right side of forehead and skull just above from right eyebrow, there was no mark of injury.
( 4 ) ABRASION 3 cm x 0. 2 cm leaner shape on lower and outer part of right upper arm red in colour 2 cm above from right elbow joint. 3. He was unconscious. Injury No. 1 had been caused by sharp edged weapon and was kept under observation. He was referred for X-ray. Injuries Nos. 2 to 4 had been caused by blunt object and were simple. 4. As per injury report of Santosh, the following 20 injuries were found on his person: 1. Lacerated wound 6 cm x 5 cm x scalp de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.