SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 586

V.M.SAHAI
OM PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GHAZIABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.SRIVASTAVA, VINOD SINHA

V. M. SAHAI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner was appointed on a Class-IV post in June, 1991 by Principal, Regional Institute of Rural Development. Rampur Maniharan, Saharanpur. In 1992 the petitioner was transferred and posted at Regional Institute of Rural Development, Dadri. Ghaziabad (now District Gautam budh Nagar ). In 1997 the petitioner was given an adverse entry for going on leave. He filed a representation against it making allegations against respondent No. 5. He also resisted his posting at the residence of respondent No. 4. On 27. 11. 1997 the respondent No. 4 issued a notice to petitioner and called for his explanation about reports from office that his work was not satisfactory. It was also mentioned that he misbehaved with employees under influence of liquor. It was also alleged that a sum of Rs. 1,800 given to him for distribution to trainees at Bhojpur was not handed over to officer. On 3. 12. 1997 the petitioner gave his explanation and denied every allegation. The respondent was not satisfied with the explanation and he issued a charge-sheet on 27. 4. 1998. And an enquiry officer was appointed on 1. 5. 1998. The enquiry officer on 14. 5. 98 wrote a letter to the petition








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top