SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 1000

A.K.YOG
BITHOORI LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Sand, I.M.Khan

A. K. YOG, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri A. C. Verma. learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent No. 1, and Sri Mehbood Ahmad Siddiqui. holding brief of Sri I. M. Khan, representing respondent No. 4. Sri R. K. Saxena, Advocate, representing respondent Nos. 2 and 3 is not present.

( 2 ) PETITIONER, belonging to Scheduled Caste, was working as Clerk-cum-typist in the Nagar palika, Fatehpur since 1984. On September 17. 1992 one Mansoor Ahmad, holding post of the stenographer in the said Nagar Palika, died living behind his widow Smt. Zahlda Khatcon, who has been, admittedly, employed at the relevant time as will be evident from perusal of para 11 of the writ petition as well as para 21 of the counter-affidavit, sworn by Mohd. Arif Mansoor, respondent No. 4.

( 3 ) THE petitioner claims that the post of Stenographer held by deceased Mansoor Ahmad was in the promotional quota In the relevant rules no particulars given but respondent No. 4 (son of the aforementioned deceased Mansoor Ahmad) was appointed on compassionate ground under dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 and copy of which has been filed as Annexure-2 to the writ petition. In para 10 of the writ petition it is











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top